Reports


  • 30-August-2018

    English

    Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, Mexico (Stage 1) - Inclusive Framework on BEPS: Action 14

    Under Action 14, countries have committed to implement a minimum standard to strengthen the effectiveness and efficiency of the mutual agreement procedure (MAP). The MAP is included in Article 25 of the OECD Model Tax Convention and commits countries to endeavour to resolve disputes related to the interpretation and application of tax treaties. The Action 14 Minimum Standard has been translated into specific terms of reference and a methodology for the peer review and monitoring process. The minimum standard is complemented by a set of best practices.The peer review process is conducted in two stages. Stage 1 assesses countries against the terms of reference of the minimum standard according to an agreed schedule of review. Stage 2 focuses on monitoring the follow-up of any recommendations resulting from jurisdictions' stage 1 peer review report. This report reflects the outcome of the stage 1 peer review of the implementation of the Action 14 Minimum Standard by Mexico.
  • 28-August-2018

    English

    OECD Territorial Reviews: Morelos, Mexico - Monitoring Progress and Special Focus on Accessibility

    This report assesses the extent to which the state of Morelos, Mexico has implemented the OECD recommendations set in the Territorial Review of Morelos, published in 2017. The recommendations addressed matters of human capital, education, skills, innovation, territorial development, sustainable development, governance and public finances. For each of them, the monitoring toolkit indicates areas of change, identifies bottlenecks and proposes ways forward. The timeframe of implementation is also considered. The report further analyses the impacts of the earthquake of 19 September 2017 and the policy responses adopted in its aftermath. It offers advice on how to lead a reconstruction process that delivers a better state of affairs than the previous one, especially concerning territorial development and infrastructure investments. It advances a new topic, on connectivity and accessibility, in view of recent investments in rail and road infrastructure.
  • 21-August-2018

    English

    Regulatory Policy: Mexico

    Access all events and reports on regulatory policy in Mexico.

    Related Documents
  • 3-August-2018

    English

    OECD Reviews of Health Systems: A series of country reports

    Those in-depth studies of the health system of member countries focus on economic issues. They assess the performance of health systems in a comparative context, identify the main challenges faced by the country health system and put forward policy options to better meet them. Reviews are initiated at the request of the country to be examined and emphasis is placed on specific issues of key policy interest.

    Related Documents
  • 13-July-2018

    English, PDF, 238kb

    OECD Employment Outlook 2018 - Key findings for Mexico

    Employment as a share of the population aged 15-74 years has not yet recovered from the impact of the global economic crisis. It stood at 59.8% in the fourth quarter of 2017, still 1.4 percentage points lower than its pre-crisis level. The employment rate is predicted to further decline through 2018 and 2019.

    Also AvailableEgalement disponible(s)
  • 4-July-2018

    Spanish, PDF, 249kb

    ¿Cómo se sitúa MÉXICO? Employment Outlook 2018

    El empleo como porcentaje de la población de 15 a 74 años aún no se ha recuperado del impacto de la crisis económica mundial. Se mantuvo en 59.8% en el cuarto trimestre de 2017, aún 1.4 puntos porcentuales por debajo de su nivel previo a la crisis. Se prevé que la tasa de empleo disminuirá aún más durante 2018 y 2019.

    Also AvailableEgalement disponible(s)
  • 15-June-2018

    Spanish, PDF, 936kb

    ¿Un ascensor social roto? ¿Cómo se compara MÉXICO?

    ¿Un ascensor social roto?Como promover la movilidad social ¿Cómo se compara MÉXICO?

    Related Documents
    Also AvailableEgalement disponible(s)
  • 15-June-2018

    English, PDF, 935kb

    A broken social elevator? Key findings for Mexico

    A broken social elevator? Key findings for Mexico

    Related Documents
    Also AvailableEgalement disponible(s)
  • 11-May-2018

    English

    Getting it Right - Strategic Priorities for Mexico

    Mexico has been a reform champion, having launched ambitious reforms in a broad range of areas. While the reforms are showing first positive effects they are not delivering to the extent they could. On many dimensions of well-being, including education, health and security amongst others, Mexico still lags behind the OECD average and regional development remains very uneven. While Mexico has done a lot to build a competitive economy, progress has been too slow in two complementary areas, namely strengthening institutions and fostering inclusion. The capacity of the public sector is weak, corruption remains widespread and the rule of law is week, all hindering trust in government institutions and the effective implementation of policies. Similarly, persistent inequalities and widespread poverty do not only mean that higher growth does not translate into widespread gains in well-being; these inequalities are also holding back growth as Mexico is not using all available talent. Mexico has taken measures to tackle these issues, but important implementation gaps remain. It will be important for the next government to build on past reform efforts, ensuring the full and effective implementation of already legislated changes to allow for reform continuity and to launch additional reforms in several priority areas, including the rule of law, education and social protection. Only then will Mexico be able to deliver a higher quality of life for all its people.
    Also AvailableEgalement disponible(s)
  • 2-May-2018

    English

    Open Government Data in Mexico - The Way Forward

    This report analyses the progresses made by Mexico in implementing the recommendations of the OECD 2016 Open Government Data Review. It identifies areas for further improvement and proposes a set of policy recommendations in areas such as institutional governance, strategic leadership, policy ownership, monitoring and reporting, and digital skills. The report underscores how open data policy can contribute to government priorities such as anti-corruption and social inclusion, and government’s crucial role in creating the conditions and opportunities for innovation and collaboration. It also underlines the role that actors from the private and third-sector, journalists and the academia play in ensuring policy continuity and sustainability.
  • 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 > >>