"OECD Productivity Manual: A Guide to the Measurement of Industry-Level and Aggregate Productivity Growth" presents the theoretical foundations to productivity measurement, and discusses implementation and measurement issues.
Read moreThe measurement of consumption of fixed capital remains a key reason for capital measurement but two additional objectives have increasingly gained in importance: establishing balance sheets for economic sectors and measuring capital services for the analysis of production and productivity.
Read moreIn this edition, the OECD highlights a decoupling between productivity growth and higher real average wages in many countries, resulting in continued declines in labour’s share of national income.
Read more
Cross-country productivity gaps are smaller than we thought |
|
International productivity gaps, 2016 |
10/12/2018 - A new OECD study finds differences in how countries measure labour input, particularly with regard to hours worked. The OECD Statistics Working Paper International productivity gaps: are labour input measures comparable? demonstrates that countries making no or minimal adjustments to average hours worked directly extracted from the primary source, such as self-reported hours actually worked in labour force surveys, systematically over-estimate labour input and, so, under-estimate labour productivity levels. In some countries, making these adjustments can lead to potential reductions in international productivity gaps with the United States of 10 percentage points. |
Productivity related databases |
Statistical referencesWorking papers and other relevant papers Compendium of Productivity Indicators |
Other relevant information
|