This report is an update of the 2015 report on Protecting Consumers through Behavioural Insights: Regulating the Communications Market in Colombia
Colombia, la cuarta economía más grande de América Latina, vuelve a estar en escena después de décadas de conflicto. El país está buscando abrir oportunidades para todos enfrentándose a sus desafíos estructurales, beneficiándose más del comercio, la inversión extranjera y aumentando la productividad.
English, PDF, 204kb
A two-page OECD summary and analysis of the Services Trade Restrictiveness Index results for Colombia.
These ready-made tables and charts provide for snapshot of aid (Official Development Assistance) for all DAC Members as well as recipient countries and territories. Summary reports by regions (Africa, America, Asia, Europe, Oceania) and the world are also available.
Statistics Working Paper N. 100 2018/13 - The paper describes inequality trends in selected emerging economies (Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, China, India, Indonesia and South Africa) in a range of monetary (i.e. income) and non-monetary dimensions of people’s life (i.e. education, health status, employment and subjective well-being).
English, PDF, 549kb
The digital revolution, globalisation and demographic changes are transforming labour markets at a time when policy makers are also struggling with slow productivity and wage growth and high levels of income inequality. The new OECD Jobs Strategy provides a comprehensive framework and policy recommendations to help countries address these challenges.
Reports and and events on regulatory policy in Colombia.
Access reviews on competition law and policy in Latin American countries conducted by the IDB and the OECD. Countries covered are Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, El Salvador, Honduras, Mexico, Panama and Peru.
The OECD is gathering input for the Stage 1 peer reviews of Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Croatia, India, Latvia, Lithuania and South Africa, and invites taxpayers to submit input on specific issues relating to access to MAP, clarity and availability of MAP guidance and the timely implementation of MAP agreements for each of these jurisdictions using the taxpayer input questionnaire.